Join the Conversation
To find out more about Facebook commenting please read the Conversation Guidelines and FAQs
'I'm livid': Lawmakers seek public meeting on overdue, over-budget Mt. Rose/I-83 project
Updated aerial tour of the Mount Rose Avenue - I 83 interchange construction John A. Pavoncello, York Dispatch
The yearslong Mount Rose Avenue/Interstate 83 interchange project is overdue and over budget, and now the Maryland contractor is redoing already completed work because it didn't meet specifications.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation spokesman Greg Penny said correcting errors is "all part of the process" and "not everybody's perfect."
“You don’t always get it right the first time,” he said.
Some York County lawmakers apparently disagree.
Reps. Kristin Phillips-Hill, R-York Township, and Stan Saylor, R-Windsor Township, have requested a public meeting with Maryland-based Cherry Hill Construction and PennDOT.
"I truly believe the change orders and additional cost are not based on circumstances beyond the contractor's control," Phillips-Hill said. "Going forward, this company needs to make good on its commitments to the contract that they proposed or they should not be able to bid on any contract in the commonwealth."
She said it was reported at a public transportation meeting that there have been a minimum of 12 project superintendents since the start.
"I'm livid," Phillips-Hill said.
Leonard White, Cherry Hill Construction's field office coordinator, could not be reached for comment by phone.
Out with the new: Cherry Hill recently was ordered to redo curbing and paving on Haines Road in Springettsbury Township because the work did not meet PennDOT's specifications, Penny confirmed.
A state inspector raised questions about work to be done in the area, but Cherry Hill reassured the inspector that it would be done properly, he said.
In the end, “subsequent testing of the pavement" indicated it wasn't up to specifications, Penny added.
"The contractor will be milling a portion of the blacktop to provide a wider band that can be properly paved and compacted," Penny said.
When asked how many other times the contractor has had to make corrections to the project over the past three years, the spokesman said PennDOT “is not going to get into specifics at this time.”
He said the department "will provide a status update at the end of this construction season.”
The York Dispatch filed a Right-to-Know Law request Friday, Aug. 3, to obtain a list of all corrections that were made during the course of the project.
'Big eyesore': Residents and business owners near the project are losing their patience.
“It’s super frustrating for me because they started the construction on Haines Road over a year ago and then just stopped and haven’t done any work in about 10 months,” Haines Road resident Justin Rudacille said.
The project, he added, is "a big eyesore.”
“I would like an explanation as to why the work was started if they were going to just stop and leave it tore up,” Rudacille said.
PennDOT gave Cherry Hill the go-ahead for the Mount Rose Avenue/I-83 project in April 2015. It was supposed to be done in June of this year.
PennDOT has said the state bears some responsibility for a slow start to the project, and it gave the contractor an extension of about five months, Penny said.
Cherry Hill should be able to finish by late 2019 or early 2020, he said.
The project’s initial price tag was $58.3 million and now stands at $59.7 million, according to PennDOT.
However, the company now has asked for even more time and money, and the final price tag and completion date are under negotiation, Penny added.
Accountability: A sign outside K.D. Rosengrant Building & Remodeling on Mount Rose Avenue sums up company president Betsy Rosengrant-Stein's assessment of the project.
"Shame on PennDOT for the Mt. Rose Ave. mess!," it reads.
Rosengrant-Stein said she would like the department to conduct better business, specifically holding the contractor accountable.
“We’ve been pretty patient for three years," she said. "We’ve already gone through three winters of this.”
There seems to be no action even on good-weather days, Rosengrant-Stein added.
“I don’t remodel interchanges, but I’d put 150 guys out there, or another shift to at least make it look like they’re working,” she said. “When you drive by and see four or five guys, I have to think, we don't ever get more time and more money for a job.”
Bid winner: The York County work is the only project that Cherry Hill Construction is working on for PennDOT, Penny said.
Six contractors initially bid on the project in January 2015, Penny said. The bids ranged from $58.3 million to $75.9 million, according to a PennDOT statement.
Cherry Hill Construction was the apparent low bidder at $58,338,000. The next bidder was York-County based G.A. & F.C. Wagman Inc. at $59,462,517.
Experience: Cherry Hill Construction has done similar work in other states.
The company won an award for its completed $95.68 million Interstate 95/Interstate 895 project in Maryland, and it is currently working on a $98.8 million Interstate-95/SR1 Interchange project in Delaware, according to the company’s website.
— Editor's note: This article has been corrected to note the project began in April 2015, and while PennDOT gave the company an extension, it was for a little more than five months, not a year. Also, PennDOT said this is the only project Cherry Hill Construction is currently doing for the department, but a department spokesman said he's unsure if it's the first project the company has ever done for PennDOT.