Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson discussed scheduling issues with lawyers at an hour-long meeting Thursday and said he would issue an order within two weeks.
In October, Simpson blocked the photo ID requirement for the Nov. 6 election. He said he was not convinced that, based on guidelines from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the state had made it possible for voters to easily obtain acceptable IDs. Under the ruling, poll workers last month were allowed to ask voters to show a photo ID, but not require it as a condition for voting.
The law is fully in effect now as the court prepares to consider the constitutional implications of a lawsuit filed in May on behalf of plaintiffs that include the Homeless Advocacy Project, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Senior Deputy Attorney General Patrick Cawley urged the judge to fast-track the case so that the state's high court could resolve any appeals before the May 21 primary.
"There's really nothing new to cover," he said.
Simpson said he was leaning toward a summer trial, citing potential scheduling conflicts if the case were squeezed into early 2013, and hoping to issue a ruling by August so appeals could be decided before the November general election.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs said a compressed scheduled would not leave enough time to thoroughly develop and litigate the case.
Michael Rubin, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who spoke for the plaintiffs' legal team Thursday, said they would seek to block enforcement of the photo ID requirement until the state Supreme Court fully resolves the "thorny constitutional issues."
Witold J. Walczak of the American Civil Liberties Union said at least 100,000 voters were unable to get IDs prior to the last election, but that only about 16,000 IDs have been issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation or the State Department.
"If you have Election Day tomorrow, you're going to have about 85,000 people who are disenfranchised," said Walczak, who also is helping the plaintiffs.
The 2013 elections will decide races for judicial and municipal offices.
At the statewide level, there is only one open seat among the three appellate courts. Superior Court Judge John L. Musmanno is retiring at the end of this year, according to court officials.
Up for yes-or-no "retention" votes on whether they should serve another 10-year term are Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille and Justice Max Baer of the Supreme Court, and Superior Court judges Jack A. Panella and Susan Peikes Gantman.