Click photo to enlarge
FILE - This is a Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013 file photo of Britain's Prince Charles, talks to people at a reception following the ceremony to award The Prince of Wales Medal for Philanthropy for 2013, in London. The Guardian newspaper won a court battle Wednesday March 12, 2014 in its efforts to disclose letters by Prince Charles a decision the newspaper argues could shed light on whether he has used his position to influence politics.
LONDON—Britain's Guardian won a court battle Wednesday in its efforts to disclose letters by Prince Charles—a decision the newspaper argues could shed light on whether he has used his position to meddle in politics.

The Guardian has campaigned for letters' release, arguing the government failed to show reasonable grounds for them to be blocked.

The Court of Appeal ruling came after Attorney General Dominic Grieve refused to let the public see Charles' correspondence with seven U.K. government departments. Grieve had argued that the particularly frank letters reflect the personal views of Charles, who is first in line to the throne.

The fear is Britons may not find Charles to be politically neutral—as a king must be—and the monarchy would be undermined.

The Guardian welcomed the ruling.

"The public has a right to know if the heir to the throne is advocating policy or promoting causes to government ministers," it said in a statement.

Grieve's office will appeal the matter to the Supreme Court.


Advertisement